Tools Before Autonomy: What 200,000 Tool Calls Taught Us About Agentic Evals
Picture: Web Directions

Conference In 6 weeks

December
Monday
to Tue 8 December 2026 · Sydney time

Tools Before Autonomy What 200,000 Tool Calls Taught Us About Agentic Evals

Where
AI Engineering room 488 George Street, 2000, Sydney
Host
Web Directions
Entry
Not stated
Sign-up
On the host's page
Open on webdirections.org

All Sydney events

You sign up with the host. foundercal only links to it.

Who you meetThe people on the listing, and what the host tells us about the room.

  • Dean Soste Speaker
Investors Not stated The listing does not say
The format Talks and halls Conference
Sign-up On the host's page Price not stated

AboutIn the host's words.

Speakers: Dean Soste (Canva)

Track: AI Engineering

Production AI problems are rarely observable through deterministic CI checks. They surface as user feedback, bad LLM-as-a-Judge scores, alerts, or even a vague sense that something is wrong. The evidence that explains them is scattered across traces, prompts, content, documentation, support tickets and logs.

At Canva, we treated that evidence as a graph and built an internal MCP layer that lets agents traverse it on demand, with every claim retaining a path back to its source.

Our teams use these tools to find production bugs; iterate on prompts and content; correlate text across Java code, Langfuse prompts and Contentful entries; run agentic end-to-end tests; and find examples of specific behaviours buried in production traces. 70 people have made over 200,000 tool calls, and one $8.87 session uncovered three reproducible bugs in production.

Rather than building a graph database or eval agent, we focused on tools that mirror the process of a good human investigator: treating the initial signal as a lead rather than a concrete fact, searching across systems and providers, retrieving detail and domain knowledge only when needed, tracing findings to their sources, exposing gaps, and identifying where to look next.

Two constraints shared by LLM systems become critical in longer-running agents: every problem has a context floor, but every token fights for attention. Too little context leaves an agent guessing; too much dilutes attention, raises cost and accumulates across the task. The balance is what we call Minimally Sufficient Context: the smallest set of information that still contains everything an agent needs to reach a justified conclusion and a human needs to verify it.

Usage has also exposed clear limits: agents miss inaccessible evidence, conclude too early and struggle to judge real-world impact. This talk turns those lessons into a practical build order for agentic evals: make evidence navigable, test tools with people on real problems, observe how they are used, and automate only what proves useful.

https://data.webdirections.org/ai-engineer-sydney/sessions.json#63a27d12-476c-46d9-b8ae-69fb922a2f59

Full text on webdirections.org .

Where

AI Engineering room

488 George Street, 2000, Sydney

Open in Maps ↗

Same week in Sydney All 139 events

Dec
to 5 Dec
Hackathon

AI Engineer Hackathon

Founders pitch

Web Directions Free
Dec
to 13 Dec
Conference

AI Week

Web Directions
Dec
to 12 Dec
Conference

NeurIPS 2026

One of the year's big ones

NeurIPS Foundation
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Lessons from Economics for the Human / Agent Software Workforce

Leadership room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Ontologies

AI Engineering room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Shipping together in an AI native team

Software Engineering room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Dependency hell is back. This time it's your agent's config.

Software Engineering room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Your website is a terrible API

AI Engineering room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

Sovereignty Is an Inference Problem

Leadership room
Web Directions
Dec
to 8 Dec
Meetup

My Agents broke APIs

AI Engineering room
Web Directions
Open on webdirections.org Mon 7 Dec ↗